The world’s largest sportswear company, Nike, is currently dealing with the fallout from a number of strategic choices that significantly reduced its market value. The seriousness of the company’s predicament is highlighted by its most recent financial figures, which showed that 25 billion dollars were removed from its market value in a single day.
Massimo Giunco, a former marketing executive at Nike with more than 20 years of experience, analyzed the difficulties facing the apparel giant in a thorough study posted on his LinkedIn page. Giunco dates the beginning of Nike’s present problems back to 2020 when the firm underwent a drastic transition led by CEO John Donahue and President of Consumer, Product, and Brand Heidi O’Neill.
Giunco asserts that this change was based on three key elements: eliminating category-based organizations, converting to a direct-to-consumer (DTC) business model, and reorganizing marketing strategy to emphasize digital and data-driven tactics. Although these adjustments seemed positive at first, they have revealed serious problems with Nike’s new business strategy.
Nike’s market share is being surpassed by new footwear brands.
Product innovation has been impacted by the loss of critical expertise brought about by the collapse of category-based teams. Inadvertently giving up market share to rivals and straining ties with wholesale partners are the results of the strong push towards DTC, especially e-commerce. Customers are gravitating towards companies like On Running, Hoka, New Balance, and Asics as a result of this shift in the industry. Nike’s once-ubiquitous presence has faded, signaling a dramatic erosion of its market dominance. Take a stroll through any summer music festival or a look around a standard gym floor to see this.
Giunco contends that Nike’s once-dominant ability to develop brands has been eclipsed by an unwavering emphasis on digital marketing and sales activation, which has resulted in excessive dependence on pricing and the erosion of profitability and brand equity. The impact on the bottom line has been severe; gross margins fell from 46% in FY22 to 43.5 % in FY23.
Nike continues to have many advantages over its competitors, such as excellent brand recognition and strong profitability. Giunco asserts that it will take a lot of time and money to restore product leadership, market influence, and brand magic.
Despite these problems, Nike maintains major competitive advantages, such as great brand awareness and profitability. However, Giunco believes that re-establishing product leadership, marketplace impact, and brand magic will necessitate significant effort and expenditure.
Image: Google
Recommended1 recommendationPublished in Shoes
